Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Discussion about rifle scopes, spotting scopes and binoculars.
Post Reply
Jonesy
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 12:45 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Remington

Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by Jonesy »

Debating between a VX II or VX 2 6-18x40 AO Fine Duplex or an older Vari-X III 6.5-20x40 AO Fine Duplex for the CZ 527 17 HH Varmint I just purchased. I've been searching eBay the last couple of weeks for a good used one. This will be used exclusively on a bench in the rat patch.

Questions:

1. Is a 6.5-20x40 scope overboard for a 17 HH? Should I go with a 6-18x40 or maybe even a 4-12x40?

2. What would be a good price for a Vari-X III 6.5-20x40 AO Fine Duplex in good condition?

Thank You,

Jonesy
User avatar
Rick in Oregon
Moderator
Posts: 5180
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
Contact:

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by Rick in Oregon »

Hi there, Jonesy,
Either would be fine for a rat rifle, and I have rifles that wear both versions.

The only thing I find a bit of a hassle in the rat patch with an AO scope, is always reaching up and over to adjust parallax at the objective barrel. But with a 17HH, you'll most likely set it in one place and really not have to move it much, as the effective range of the HH should cover one, maybe two settings in the field. All my 'more serious' rat rifles wear 6.5-20's with side-focus, and I much prefer them because of that one feature.

My 17AH on a Ruger No.3/Pac-Nor wears an older VX-III with AO, and it seldom gets moved much in the field, so I'd expect about the same for what you're after.

Some of my walkabout rifles wear 4-12's, and many times I'm wishing for a tad more power....FWIW. In the rat patch off the bench though, most of the time my scopes are set on 10X - 14X for a good field of view, especially when the heat comes up, then the mirage limits magnification anyway.

As for price, the last one I sold went for around $450 if memory serves.

Either scope will allow you to make head shots on rats peeking out of their burrows over their mounds past 250 yards, as long as the ammo, the rifle and you are up to the task. :D
Semper Fortis
Rick in Oregon
NRA Life/OHA/VHA/VVA

Oregon, East of the Cascades - Where Common Sense Still Prevails

Image
User avatar
futuretrades
Senior Member
Posts: 835
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:16 am
.204 Ruger Guns: HOWA 1500 .204 Ruger Varmint, Bull Bbl, Lupy 6-18x40 custom

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by futuretrades »

After I ordered my VT, while waiting for it from Cooper, I needed a scope for it. I got a flyer from Todd Kindler with one of his used Leupold scopes off,one of his test rifles. It just so happened it was the exact scope I was looking for, a VXIII AO 6.5-20 with the varmint hunter reticle. Cost, $500.00. IMHO, it is the best buy I ever made on a Leupold scope! :mrgreen: Like RIO, I spend a considerable amount of time behind my rifles in the "Rat Patch". And like RIO said I have my power set at 14 to 16. But when the temps rise, I back down to 12, or maybe even 10 power. I think you will be completely satisfied with that 6.5 to 20 Leupold on your 17 Hornet! On both my 223 and 204, I have the Leupold VXII 6-18 AO Long Range Varmint reticle. I really like them too!
NRA Benefactor Life member
HOWA 1500 Varmint 204 Ruger, Bull Barrel, Hogue Overmold Stock, Leupold VXII 6-18x40mm AO LRV Custom Reticle Timney Trigger
Cooper Mdl 21 20VarTargW/Leupold VXIII, 6-20x40AO Varmint Hunter reticle.
Jim White
Moderator
Posts: 1467
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:06 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: CZ-527, Remington 700 VLTHSS, Cooper Model 21, Remington 40x

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by Jim White »

I have both AO and SF parallax adjusted scopes and from a bench either one works quite well for me. The facts are; there are plus and minus with each system.

One thing for sure; the SF scopes have a extra piece of glass that certainly doesn't help clarity IMO (the more pieces of glass to look through the more potential for something to be amiss), the AO type scope doesn't. Another plus for the AO scopes is one can really tweak the parallax right down to to a knats-behind. The SF can as well but the movements are more course and less refine. On the flip-side, AO style scopes tend to be longer than their SF counterpart.

FWIW, my AO style scopes are Leupold, Nikon and Swarvoski. My SF type scopes are Leupold and Zeiss. The scopes you have mentioned as well as those by the previous responders should serve you well barring any material defects in the scope, which does happen, even with the high end brands.

Always, get the best scope you can afford even if you have to hold off on the purchase for a little while.

HTH
User avatar
Bodei
Senior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:23 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Howa Mod 1500 24" BBL .204R; Cooper M21 20 VT; CZ 527 17HH
Location: Reno, NV
Contact:

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by Bodei »

I find that I rarely use more than 12x in the rat patch. I also don't plan on shooting my hornet past 150-200 yards therefore I went with a 4-12 Leupold. So far it works great!
Image
K = ½mv2
User avatar
Captqc
Senior Member
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:09 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Cooper Phoenix .204
Location: Tigard, OR.

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by Captqc »

futuretrades wrote:After I ordered my VT, while waiting for it from Cooper, I needed a scope for it. I got a flyer from Todd Kindler with one of his used Leupold scopes off,one of his test rifles. It just so happened it was the exact scope I was looking for, a VXIII AO 6.5-20 with the varmint hunter reticle. Cost, $500.00. IMHO, it is the best buy I ever made on a Leupold scope! :mrgreen: Like RIO, I spend a considerable amount of time behind my rifles in the "Rat Patch". And like RIO said I have my power set at 14 to 16. But when the temps rise, I back down to 12, or maybe even 10 power. I think you will be completely satisfied with that 6.5 to 20 Leupold on your 17 Hornet! On both my 223 and 204, I have the Leupold VXII 6-18 AO Long Range Varmint reticle. I really like them too!
Dang Kevin you sure got a heck of a deal! Gary
Cammo
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 8:49 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Ruger Hawkeye Predator
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by Cammo »

Jonesy

I have a CZ 527 in .17 Hornet and I use a 4.5-14X50 Zeiss Conquest. I found this to be perfect on foxes and rabbits.

Image

Regards
savgebolt
New Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:05 am
.204 Ruger Guns: T/C Venture , model 12 savage
Location: east central illinois

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by savgebolt »

Jonesy, there you go ,,,, couldnt get a better board of review for advice on any subject involving rifle shooting on the internet,,,,, they have been there,,, done that ,,, this forum is fantastic , a great group of people,,, extremely knowledgeable and always willing to help
moorepower
New Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:53 am
.204 Ruger Guns: LRPV

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by moorepower »

I use a Weaver V-16 with a dot reticle and A/O and love it. I would think it would be a good fit for the .17HH. It's very effective out to 300 when the wind is light
204Luver
New Member
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 10:25 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: 527 Varmint; Rem. 700 VLS

Re: Leupold 6.5-20x40 AO too much for a 17 Hornet?

Post by 204Luver »

I agree you do not need more than 12 - 14x to shoot p-dogs but an AO scope is a huge PITA to me. Regardless of the caliber I want the rat in clear focus. There is no "set and forget." I'm focusing at 75 yards one second, then 400 the next, and 150 the next. Even limiting shots to 175 or so, as I do when shooting my 17 HMR, I am still constantly making focus changes. If a scope doesn't have a good side-focus, it isn't going to a town with me.

Also, while you don't need high power to shoot, being able to go up to 24 - 25x (or more) is really nice when you are trying to figure out if you are looking at a clod or a rat's head. In the $500 or so range I'd take an Athlon Midas 4.5-27 over any Leupold in that price range. Glass is just as good, retical is way better.
Post Reply