Is there much difference?

Jersey Hunter · Post by **Jersey Hunter** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:21 am

Is there much difference in clarity, brightness, for hunting between these scopes. None of the sporting stores in my area carry enough a selection to compare.
Weaver grand slam
Bushnell elite 4200
Nikon buck master

Thanks,

Hotshot · Post by **Hotshot** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:49 am

You've picked 3 good ones. When I can't go with a Leupold VXIII, I go bushnell Elite.

nevadamatt · Post by **nevadamatt** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:46 am

I have a nikon buckmaster 4.5 to 14x40 and i love it! I have bought another one for another rifle and would say for the price its the best glass one could get.the bdc is nice but the other i got did not have it and its nice to. good luck

acloco · Post by **acloco** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:35 pm

Personally, I think the Nikon anything scopes that say x40 should indicat that it is actually x32 or less. Clarity is good, expecially for the price, but the x32 mm actual objective size and the wide line reticles have turned me off of them.

The Elite is the top scope you listed, by far.

Jersey Hunter · Post by **Jersey Hunter** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:30 am

Thanks for the replies I went with the elite 4200.

Is there much difference?

Is there much difference?

Re: Is there much difference?

Re: Is there much difference?

Re: Is there much difference?

Re: Is there much difference?