204 Ruger VS 22-250

General discussion and information about the .204 Ruger.
Post Reply
walkingtall
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:55 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: none

204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by walkingtall »

Hi Guys, I'm new to this forum and would like some user feedback. I have read many different ballastic charts but feel actual experience will tell me a real story. I have a chance to buy a 40XB in 22-250 and it is a beauty, however I've wanted a 204. Can anyone tell me how these two calibers compare at longer ranges? (400 - 500 yds) I'm thinking the 39 or 40 gr in the 204 and 50 or 55 gr in the 22-250.
User avatar
glenn asher
Senior Member
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:25 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage 12fvss, CZ 527 American
Location: kentucky
Contact:

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by glenn asher »

I don't think anyone will argue that the heavier bullets of the .22/250 will hit harder way out yonder, weight and momentum favor the heavier bullets. Trajectories will favor the .204 at those distances mentioned, but with less "thump" when it gets there.
Build a man a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life!
walkingtall
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:55 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: none

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by walkingtall »

Glenn I agree with you but this will my used to cut paper over a bench so the wollup isn't the biggest factor. The trajectory is more important , and the ability to buck wind.
Jim White
Moderator
Posts: 1475
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:06 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: CZ-527, Remington 700 VLTHSS, Cooper Model 21, Remington 40x

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Jim White »

If its for target shooting, I would use a 22-250 with a 7-8 twist barrel over the 204 because the bullets and materials for the 22 cals is already available where they're not for the 204. If your're shooting waaaay out there (>600 yards) I would look at a 6.5 twist 22 cal barrel and launch 90 grain bullets.

HTH

JW
walkingtall
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:55 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: none

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by walkingtall »

JW
The 22/250 is a 14 twist so anything over about a 62gr is out of the question.
Va varminter
Senior Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:17 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage 12 FV
Location: Roanoke Va.

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Va varminter »

I read on this forum a few weeks ago about Berger making a 55grain pill for 204. So if you were thinking about putting a faster twist barrel on a 204, that's the deal.
http://www.fairtax.org
Election day can't get here soon enough.
User avatar
Rick in Oregon
Moderator
Posts: 5210
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
Contact:

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Rick in Oregon »

Berger is indeed making .204" 55 grain bullets, but there are much more suitable cases to take advantage of this heavy for caliber bullet than the 204 Ruger case. It would work, there are just better case choices with more powder capacity.
Semper Fortis
Rick in Oregon
NRA Life/OHA/VHA/VVA

Oregon, East of the Cascades - Where Common Sense Still Prevails

Image
Jim White
Moderator
Posts: 1475
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:06 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: CZ-527, Remington 700 VLTHSS, Cooper Model 21, Remington 40x

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Jim White »

walkingtall wrote:JW
The 22/250 is a 14 twist so anything over about a 62gr is out of the question.
... which is why I mentioned 7 & 8 twist barrels (based off your 1st post "used to cut paper over a bench so the wollup isn't the biggest factor..." ). I read that to mean target shooting. If I misread and your're keeping the 14 twist factory barrel (or anything slower than a 8 twist) then I'll withdraw the suggestion because you wouldn't hit a bull-in-the-butt @ 100 yards with them then.

Jim
walkingtall
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:55 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: none

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by walkingtall »

Well,the 22-250 I was considering to purchase isn't available anymore but I still have alot of interest in the 204.
majcl5
Senior Member
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:48 am
Location: Oregon, GO DUCKS,GO BLAZERS

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by majcl5 »

I have had both hunted with both and sold my 22-250 and bought another .204
May Your Barrels Be Hot & Your Smiles Plentiful
Rem 700 VLSS .204
Bayou City Boy

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Bayou City Boy »

I had shot 20 caliber rifles many years before Ruger and Hornady "invented" the 204 Ruger. I currently own five 20 caliber rifles, but I also own three 22-250's.

There will always be a place in my gun safes for at least one 22-250. Its still a much better large varmint/predator round than any of the current 20 caliber rifles available because of factory bullets. Berger will improve this with their heavier grain bullet that they have announced, but it will be a custom rifle only proposition to use them due to required twist rates.

Most folks won't pay for a custom rifle, and in those cases, the 22-250 is the better bet for an all-around factory varmint cartridge....

When I use " " around invented, if you Google 20 Terminator you wont find much current information. But, it is a 20 caliber wildcat built off the 222 Rem Mag case that is almost identical in all dimensions to the 204 Ruger.... Guess which came first....?

JMO - BCB
User avatar
Rick in Oregon
Moderator
Posts: 5210
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
Contact:

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Rick in Oregon »

204 vs. 22-250...my $0.02 worth: For larger predators such as coyotes at most common ranges, or rockchucks or eastern groundhogs past the 400 yard mark, hands down the .22-250. But for the smaller varmints such as ground squirrels or prairie dogs and the high volume shooting such varmints entail, then it's the 204 Ruger.

Depends on what kind of varmint you'll shoot more often rather than "which is better" sort of arguement. Both are excellent calibers, both have their specific range of optimum uses. Both will work for all applications mentioned, but each has it's own realm of "best" use.

Decide what you'll shoot most often, then pick the appropriate caliber that best suits that specific varmint.
Semper Fortis
Rick in Oregon
NRA Life/OHA/VHA/VVA

Oregon, East of the Cascades - Where Common Sense Still Prevails

Image
User avatar
Captqc
Senior Member
Posts: 1037
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:09 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Cooper Phoenix .204
Location: Tigard, OR.

Re: 204 Ruger VS 22-250

Post by Captqc »

Just do like me and get both! I love my .204 but a few weeks ago a Ruger No.1 in 22-250 trapped me with her charms :eek: I'd say that the best bet would be the .204 but I'm weak and couldn't resist the No. 1 :D Gary
Post Reply