.204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

General discussion and information about the .204 Ruger.
Post Reply
User avatar
Verminator2
Senior Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:03 am
.204 Ruger Guns: DPMS 24" stainless fluted.
Location: Eastern OR
Contact:

.204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by Verminator2 »

I hate to admit it, but right now I don't have a .204 :eek: I sold my DPMS a while ago to fund a .280 AI, I needed a big game rifle. Now I'm starting to miss the small calibers for squirrels and such. So I've been searching for some sort of a squirrel rifle and was wondering what you all thought about the .204 vs. the .17 Fireball? I figure the .204 has some extra range on it, but I'm really only going to be shooting 200-300 yards on squirrels. How does the launch factor compare? Fireball brass is expensive, but it should last a long time. I probably won't be shooting more than 100 rounds in a session anyway. Thanks.
Bomb Squad: If you see me running, try and keep up
User avatar
glenn asher
Senior Member
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:25 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage 12fvss, CZ 527 American
Location: kentucky
Contact:

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by glenn asher »

I've been fooling around with a .22 Hornet here lately. It's a pain in the neck to load, since the case is so small, and so are the bullets. The case is a pain, and it's difficult to get the bullets started into the case. My .221 Fireball is easier to load, but the .204 (of those three cases) is MUCH easier to load. For that reason alone, I'd go with the .204.

I'm getting cranky these days :mrgreen:
Build a man a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life!
User avatar
wirelessguy2005
Senior Member
Posts: 663
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:59 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Custom 20 SCC, Savage LRPV 20 Nitro , Howa 1500 204 Ruger
Location: Indiana

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by wirelessguy2005 »

i have multiple rifles in both calibers. I truly love the 204 as a caliber and would never be without one. However i also enjoy the .17 fireball and the many benefits that it offers. If you are handloading the .17 fireball it can be just as affordable to shoot as the .204 and offers a few benefits that the 204 doesn't. The fireball has almost zero recoil, has less report, and takes less powder. If you pick up some of the 30, 27, or 25 grain gold bullets from Todd Kindler it can make the .17 fireball a real contender in the .204 realm. The 30 grain gold has as high of a BC as the 40 grain 204 Vmax bullet. Just my 2 cents
User avatar
Sidewinderwa
Senior Member
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:39 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Savages
Location: Washington state

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by Sidewinderwa »

I have both calibers but have not had my 17 Fireball very long. Just got it back from the gunsmith to try to get the accuracy up to snuff. You can see the hits better with the FB than the 204. The wind will deflect the FB more than the 204. I think that either caliber will do just fine out to 300 yards. My big fingers do better putting the 204 in the case than the smaller FB. I will never be without a 204 however, it is my favorite! I am putting a 20 VarTarg together now for the best of both worlds :banana:
Image
Please, no Sidewinder today!
User avatar
Verminator2
Senior Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:03 am
.204 Ruger Guns: DPMS 24" stainless fluted.
Location: Eastern OR
Contact:

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by Verminator2 »

I'm thinking I'm going to try the .17 Fireball. I really like the idea of zero recoil,17gr. of powder, and 20 grain bullets zipping along at 4000. Hope that doesn't mean I'm banned :shock: :lol: I'll end up with another .204 barrel for it probably. I might try a barrel nut or something on this and have it like a savage. Except prettier :whistle:

:lol:
Bomb Squad: If you see me running, try and keep up
User avatar
Rick in Oregon
Moderator
Posts: 5207
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
Contact:

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by Rick in Oregon »

Verminator2 wrote:I'm thinking I'm going to try the .17 Fireball. I really like the idea of zero recoil,17gr. of powder, and 20 grain bullets zipping along at 4000. Hope that doesn't mean I'm banned :shock: :lol: I'll end up with another .204 barrel for it probably. I might try a barrel nut or something on this and have it like a savage. Except prettier :whistle:

:lol:
Verm: No worries, they didn't ban me with my 17 Mach IV (samo-samo as the 17FB), so you should be safe. ;)

We love our 204's, but ya just gotta admit, these babies look just right on the bench in the rat patch:

Image

Skippy REALLY hates them, I really love 'em. The cases shown are freshly formed from 221FB, neck turned and annealed, and loaded with H322 and the 25gr Berger at 3,860fps. The results speak for themselves:

Image

Impact was at 326 yards. See what I mean?.....How can you possibly resist? :wink:
Semper Fortis
Rick in Oregon
NRA Life/OHA/VHA/VVA

Oregon, East of the Cascades - Where Common Sense Still Prevails

Image
User avatar
Verminator2
Senior Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:03 am
.204 Ruger Guns: DPMS 24" stainless fluted.
Location: Eastern OR
Contact:

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by Verminator2 »

That's what I like to see Rick! The more I think about this the more I want it, just something different. I really need a job so I can get this before the rats go down :lol:
Bomb Squad: If you see me running, try and keep up
tuck2
Junior Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Western Nebr.

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by tuck2 »

I,m an old gun nut, started shooting prairie dogs back in 1949 with a 22 rifle with a Wearver J-4 scope. You will pertty well set up if you come out to prairie dog country with 17 HMR, 17 Fireball, and .204 Ruger rifles. If you go to www.huntingnut.com and down load their ballistics program you can see the difference of the three rounds. Prairie dogs get muzzle blast smart so I like the small calibers.
FireBallGuy
Senior Member
Posts: 417
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 7:30 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Remington Model 700 VSF 204 Ruger
Location: Manitoba Canada

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by FireBallGuy »

I own both and shoot both OFTEN and to me the 204 is my long range rig and the little 17 is my short range varmint/plinking gun. It is stupid cheap to reload for, has no recoil, you see hits and generally is a lot of fun to shoot! I have made clean kills out to just past 400 yards on calm days with mine and is my personal choice for hunting edible things such as bunnies....dumps them like a bad habit! Fouling is pretty much a non issue, my SPS shoots VERY well with 25 grain bergers and hornadys, not much luck yet with the 20's though. I feel EVERYONE needs to have a centerfire 17 to play with!
Remington Model 700 SPS 17 Remington Fireball Nikon Buckmaster 6-18X40SF, Remington Model 700 VSF 204 Ruger Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24X40AO, Savage Model 12 FVSS .22-250 Remington Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24X40AO
Bayou City Boy

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by Bayou City Boy »

They are both excellent cartridges, but they are different enough from each other that you need one of each.

JMO - BCB
FireBallGuy
Senior Member
Posts: 417
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 7:30 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Remington Model 700 VSF 204 Ruger
Location: Manitoba Canada

Re: .204 Ruger vs. .17 Fireball

Post by FireBallGuy »

Had a nice shot at a LARGE Jack rabbit on saturday.....about 300 yards....was kind of trotting along, thought about taking a shot on the run but I kinda figured he would stop and sure enough. One 25 grain Vmax to the chest and the deed was done! Love this gun!
Remington Model 700 SPS 17 Remington Fireball Nikon Buckmaster 6-18X40SF, Remington Model 700 VSF 204 Ruger Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24X40AO, Savage Model 12 FVSS .22-250 Remington Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24X40AO
Post Reply