Striker vs Hammer?

Talk about or share information about Ruger handguns.
Post Reply
skipper
Moderator
Posts: 1618
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:32 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Remington XR 100, Custom build Lilja/Panda/Shehane/Jewell
Location: Cypress, TX

Striker vs Hammer?

Post by skipper »

I received a lot of comments about my choice of concealed carry pistol, the Hellcat, so I thought I would expound on why I'm wanting a striker fired pistol instead of a 1911 style with hammer. I'm posting pictures of the weapons so I can make my point. I too am a fan of Kimber firearms, well at least their pistols. The picture below is of my Ultra Carry 45. The problem is that while cocked the area just in front of the hammer becomes a repository for dirt, lint and moisture to get directly into the action. NOT GOOD. That's beside the fact that people usually relate a hammer cocked back as an unsafe act. I can't tell you why, they just do.

The second picture is of the Springfield Hellcat. There is no such void because the striker is enclosed and the action is protected from such contaminates. I have to clean my Kimber and Sig religiously to keep them free of the lint and dirt that naturally accumulates in the area just in front of the trigger. I'm afraid that one day I'm going to need my pistol just to find it incapable of firing. Worse is the thought of the hammer catching on my clothing as I'm trying to draw it from the holster buried beneath my shirt. Just my two cents worth, as if anyone really cared.
Kimber Ultra Carry.jpg
Kimber Ultra Carry.jpg (51.48 KiB) Viewed 8947 times
Hellcat.jpg
Hellcat.jpg (47.75 KiB) Viewed 8947 times
Image Hold 'em & Squeeze 'em
Bill K
Senior Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:00 am
.204 Ruger Guns: also now, a Savage switch bull barrel in 204R. 23 inch SS
Location: Lake Forest, Ca.

Re: Striker vs Hammer?

Post by Bill K »

It is all in what each of us want and feel the most comfortable with Skipper. They both have pro's and con's.
I always felt fine with the hammer 1911's, cocked and locked, on duty carry and off. Never had any issue with hammer hanging up on a draw.
And I do also own a stiker style handgun, which I carry often, now days. So both will serve very well and, as I said, WE each spend our money on what we feel we like best and want. Nothing wrong with that at all. :D
User avatar
Tom Kat
Senior Member
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:04 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: CZ 527, Ruger American Predator in Magpul Hunter stock

Re: Striker vs Hammer?

Post by Tom Kat »

Agree with Bill K. I have a Glock 23 as my home defense weapon. I sometimes carry a M & P Shield (in 40). My Kimber Micro 9 is a good shooter as well, I have dinged a metal plate at 100 yards with it several times. Additionally, that Kimber feeds and fires reliably (as does the Glock and the Shield, both Striker fired guns) I don't think there is a right or wrong answer. I will say that my confidence in the striker fired guns has grown over the years.

I still like revolvers...but I don't carry them.
"The difficulty lies not so much in developing new ideas as in escaping from old ones."

John Maynard Keynes
Post Reply